About

The Repair Order reads state lemon law and vehicle warranty rules the way they are actually written, and reports what the text says with the section number attached.

What this site does

Lemon law coverage online tends to arrive in two forms. One is a law firm page that describes a general standard and asks the reader to call. The other is a fifty-state summary table that was accurate when it was compiled. Neither reliably tells a reader the number in their state's statute, the date a rule took effect, or whether a change that made the news actually reaches their vehicle.

Every article here starts from a primary source: the statute itself, a state agency's own publication, a court opinion, a bill analysis in the legislative record, or the Code of Federal Regulations. Thresholds are quoted with the subdivision they come from. Effective dates are given as dates. Where two official documents disagree, that disagreement is reported rather than smoothed over.

What this site does not do

This site publishes general information. It does not give legal advice, does not evaluate anyone's vehicle, and does not tell a reader whether they have a claim. There is no eligibility checker and no case evaluation, because applying a statute to one person's facts is what a licensed attorney does. There are no referral arrangements with law firms and no affiliate links.

How the numbers are kept current

Statutes move. California amended its lemon law twice between 2024 and 2025, and lists published by state agencies are reissued annually. Articles here carry a section noting which figures have a shelf life and where the current version is published, so a reader can check the source directly rather than trusting a page's publication date.

Corrections

If a statement here does not match its source, the correction is the point of the site. Corrections are made in the article itself rather than in a note at the bottom, and the reason for the change is stated where the change is.

This site is not a law firm and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Reading it creates no attorney-client relationship. Anyone deciding what to do about a specific vehicle should consult a licensed attorney in their state.

Popular posts from this blog

Four Repair Attempts Create a Presumption in California, Not an Automatic Buyback

A California owner whose new vehicle has been in the shop four times for the same defect is often told the car "qualifies as a lemon." The statute says something narrower. Four repair attempts inside a defined window create a rebuttable presumption that a reasonable number of attempts has been made. A presumption is an evidentiary starting position, not an entitlement to a check. Understanding the difference determines what a repair file has to prove, and it explains why two owners with identical repair histories can end up in very different positions. The window comes first, and it is short Civil Code section 1793.22, the Tanner Consumer Protection Act, opens every one of its thresholds with the same clause: the qualifying events must occur within 18 months from delivery to the buyer or 18,000 miles on the odometer, whichever occurs first . Not 18 months and 18,000 miles. Whichever arrives sooner closes the window. A commuter driving 1,600 miles a month reaches 18,000...
Read more